Abstract
This research aims to evaluate the economic efficiency and investment impact of implementing the Physics Practicum Learning Method to enhance student learning outcomes at SMA Negeri 2 Lhokseumawe. The practicum method is designed to provide direct experiences to students, enabling them to apply theoretical knowledge in practical situations. In this study adopts an economic evaluation approach, analyzing how the utilization of educational resources, including teacher time, and practicum facilities, can yield superior learning outcomes compared to conventional teaching methods The research involves quantitative data collection through surveys, practicum observations, and student learning outcome evaluations. Economic analysis is conducted to assess the educational investment by considering operational costs and benefits obtained. The research findings are expected to provide in-depth insights into the efficiency of the Physics Practicum Learning Method in the educational at SMA Negeri 2 Lhokseumawe. Practical implications of these results may assist policymakers and education practitioners in enhancing physics education quality, considering the economic aspects involved.
References
-
Anderson, L. W., & Krathwohl, D. R. (Eds.). (2001). A Taxonomy for Learning, Teaching, and Assessing: A Revision of Bloom's Taxonomy of Educational Objectives. New York: Longman.
-
Arikunto, S. (2010). Prosedur Penelitian: Suatu Pendekatan Praktek. Jakarta: Rineka Cipta.
-
Becker, G. S. (1964). Human Capital: A Theoretical and Empirical Analysis, with Special Reference to Education. University of Chicago Press.
-
Cohen, W. M., & Levinthal, D. A. (1990). Absorptive Capacity: A New Perspective on Learning and Innovation. Administrative Science Quarterly, 35(1), 128–152.
-
Darling-Hammond, L. (2017). Teacher Education around the World: Changing Policies and Practices. Paris: UNESCO.
-
Gulo, W. (2012). Metodologi Penelitian. Seri Buku Teks Universitas. Jakarta: PT. Grasindo.
-
Hanushek, E. A. (1986). The Economics of Schooling: Production and Efficiency in Public Schools. Journal of Economic Literature, 24(3), 1141–1177.
-
Hattie, J. (2009). Visible Learning: A Synthesis of Over 800 Meta-Analyses Relating to Achievement. New York: Routledge.
-
Hmelo-Silver, C. E. (2004). Problem-Based Learning: What and How Do Students Learn? Educational Psychology Review, 16(3), 235–266.
-
Lunenburg, F. C., & Irby, B. J. (2008). The Principalship: Vision to Action. Boston, MA: Allyn & Bacon.
-
Mansfield, E. (1995). Academic Research and Industrial Innovation: An Update of Empirical Findings. Research Policy, 24(6), 773–776.
-
Marzano, R. J., Pickering, D. J., & Heflebower, T. (2011). The Highly Engaged Classroom. Bloomington, IN: Solution Tree Press.
-
Mulyasa, E. (2013). Kurikulum Tingkat Satuan Pendidikan (KTSP): Konsep, Landasan, dan Implementasi. Bandung: PT Remaja Rosdakarya.
-
OECD. (2019). Education at a Glance 2019: OECD Indicators. Paris: OECD Publishing.
-
Sudjana, N. (2010). Penilaian Hasil Proses Belajar Mengajar. Bandung: PT Remaja Rosdakarya.
-
UNESCO. (2015). Education for Sustainable Development Goals: Learning Objectives. United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization.
Author Biographies
Cut Keumala Sari
Sekolah Menegah Atas Negeri 2 Lhokseumawe
Sekolah Menegah Atas Negeri 2 Lhokseumawe, Kota Lhokseumawe, Provinsi Aceh, Indonesia