The Probability of Implementing Restorative Justice in Business Dispute Resolution

  • Authors

  • Affiliations

  • Published

  • Section Articles

  • DOI https://doi.org/10.56347/jle.v4i1.236

  • Issue
Views icon

308

Views

Downloads icon

182

Downloads

Altmetrics icon

Altmetrics

Abstract

The research analyzes the urgency and success probability of restorative justice implementation in business dispute resolution. The study employs normative legal research methodology through statutory and conceptual approaches. Legal material collection utilizes literature studies by identifying, gathering, and inventorying relevant primary and secondary legal sources. The analysis results demonstrate that restorative justice application becomes essential in business dispute resolution as it provides efficient, economical solutions while preserving business relationships. The mechanism serves as a strategic alternative to rigid and costly litigation, strengthening legal certainty and business climate competitiveness in Indonesia. The success rate of restorative justice in business dispute resolution shows promising potential when supported by parties' willingness, competent facilitators, and clear regulatory frameworks.

References

  1. Ady Thea, D. A. (2022, September 27). Berharap konsep keadilan restoratif diadopsi dalam penyelesaian sengketa bisnis. Hukumonline.
  2. Al Mandari, M. W. N., Thalib, H., & Salle. (2024). Penerapan restorative justice terhadap tindak pidana ujaran kebencian melalui media elektronik. Journal of Lex Philosophy (JLP), 5(2), 1153-1168.
  3. Ambarwati, A., Setyaningrum, R. P., & Rezeki, F. (2024). The effect of burnout and employee engagement on turnover intention with work-life balance as a mediating variable in millennial employees of PT. ABC and PT. XYZ in Bekasi Regency. Indonesian Interdisciplinary Journal of Sharia Economics (IIJSE), 7(2), 4073-4090. https://doi.org/10.31538/iijse.v7i2.5165
  4. Anwar, M. A. (2020). Kebijakan hukum pidana dalam penanggulangan destructive fishing pada rezim pembangunan berkelanjutan. Jurnal Hukum Samudra Keadilan. https://doi.org/10.33059/jhsk.v15i2.2182
  5. Anwar, M., & Wijaya, M. R. (2020). Fungsionalisasi dan implikasi asas kepentingan terbaik bagi anak yang berkonflik dengan hukum: Studi putusan Pengadilan Tinggi Tanjung Karang. Undang: Jurnal Hukum. https://doi.org/10.22437/ujh.2.2.265-292
  6. Anwar, M., Lilyana, B., & Zatika, D. A. (2024). Sosialisasi perlindungan hukum bagi guru dalam menjalankan tugasnya di Kota Bandar Lampung. AJAD: Jurnal Pengabdian Kepada Masyarakat, 4(3), 708-715. https://doi.org/10.59431/ajad.v4i3.414
  7. Australian Law Reform Commission. (1999). Review of the federal civil justice system (ALRC Report 89).
  8. Dinata, S. (2025). Reconstruction of foreign investment dispute settlement in Indonesia. Yustisia Tirtayasa: Jurnal Tugas Akhir, 5(1), 28-47. https://dx.doi.org/10.51825/yta.v5i1.30617
  9. Gijoh, L. G. G. (2021). Implementasi hukum dalam kontrak bisnis internasional. Lex Et Societatis, 9(1), 111-119. https://doi.org/10.35796/les.v9i1.32142
  10. Hardiyono, Pongky, P., Purwanti, S., Rusba, K., Siboro, I., & Putri, H. E. (2023). Inspeksi storage tank di PT. ABC pada proyek PT. XYZ menggunakan metode risk based inspection. Media Bina Ilmiah, 17(9), 2311-2318. https://doi.org/10.33578/mbi.v17i9.376
  11. Harefa, B. (2018). Mediasi penal sebagai bentuk diversi dalam penyelesaian perkara pidana anak berbasis keadilan restoratif. Jurnal Komunikasi Hukum (JKH), 4(1), 18-26. https://doi.org/10.23887/jkh.v4i1.13657
  12. Kristanto, A. (2022). Kajian Peraturan Jaksa Agung Nomor 15 Tahun 2020 tentang penghentian penuntutan berdasarkan keadilan restoratif. Lex Renaissance, 7(1), 180-193. https://doi.org/10.20885/JLR.vol7.iss1.art14
  13. Kristiani, E., & Vic S., B. J. (2025). Urgensi penegasan kewenangan pengadilan hubungan industrial dalam penyelesaian perselisihan hubungan industrial. Jurnal Retentum, 7(1), 370-385. http://dx.doi.org/10.46930/retentum.v7i1.5379
  14. Latimer, J., Dowden, C., & Muise, D. (2005). The effectiveness of restorative justice practices: A meta-analysis. Department of Justice Canada.
  15. Mahendra, I. G. N. K. J. S. (2025). Peran bhabinkamtibmas dalam penanganan kasus tindak pidana ringan berdasarkan restorative justice di Polsek Kuta Utara. Jurnal Yusthima, 5(1), 451-364. https://doi.org/10.36733/yusthima.v5i1.11488
  16. Ndruru, D. (2024). Perspektif hukum pidana terhadap tindak pidana penipuan oleh oknum TNI berdasarkan keadilan restoratif. Law, Development and Justice Review, 7(2), 158-174. https://doi.org/10.14710/ldjr.7.2024.158-174
  17. Nugroho, A. P. (2023). Restorative justice: Terwujudnya asas keadilan dan asas kepastian hukum pada instansi kepolisian. Recidive: Jurnal Hukum Pidana dan Penanggulangan Kejahatan, 12(2), 152-271. https://doi.org/10.20961/recidive.v12i2.71620
  18. Nursando, R., & Syahputra, D. R. (2024). Pendekatan hukum progresif dalam reformulasi pembayaran uang pengganti pada kasus tindak pidana korupsi. Ius Commercii (Jurnal Hukum Dan Bisnis), 1(1), 1-9.
  19. Prastiti, H. S. (2022). Membedah parameter berusaha dalam upaya meningkatkan kemudahan berinvestasi di Indonesia (Studi komparasi Indonesia dan Vietnam). Dharmasisya Jurnal Program Magister Hukum FHUI, 2(1), 439-456.
  20. Prayuti, Y., Lany, A., Takaryanto, D., Hamdan, A. R., Ciptawan, B., & Nugroho, E. A. (2024). Efektivitas mediasi dan arbitrase dalam penyelesaian sengketa konsumen kesehatan. Syntax Idea, 6(3), 1533-1544. https://doi.org/10.46799/syntax-idea.v6i3.3165.
  21. Rosidi, A., Zainuddin, M., & Arifiana, I. (2024). Metode dalam penelitian hukum normatif dan sosiologis (field research). Journal Law and Government, 2(1), 46-58. https://doi.org/10.31764/jlag.v2i1.21606
  22. Simandjuntak, R., & Singkay, R. (2024). Inovasi dalam penyelesaian sengketa: Pendekatan alternatif yang mengedepankan keadilan kolaboratif. Jurnal Social Science, 12(2), 187-196. https://doi.org/10.53682/jss.v12i2.10858
  23. Singapore Mediation Centre. (2024, July 24). SMC's INTEGRAF scheme, featured on Business Times.
  24. Sofyan, & Syatar, A. (2020). Restorative justice dalam upaya penyelesaian kejahatan hak asasi manusia perspektif hukum Islam. Shautuna: Jurnal Ilmiah Mahasiswa Perbandingan Mazhab, 1(1), 21-36. https://doi.org/10.24252/shautuna.v1i1.12422
  25. Sulaiman, S., Harimurti, D. A., Pujiningsih, D., Handoyo, B. T., & Taufiq, M. (2025). Analisis yuridis terhadap penyelesaian sengketa perdata melalui mediasi di pengadilan. Jurnal Kolaboratif Sains, 8(2), 1152-1158. https://doi.org/10.56338/jks.v8i2.7087
  26. Syaroni, I., & Widyaningrum, T. (2024). Peningkatan efektivitas penyelesaian sengketa administrasi negara melalui pendekatan alternatif. Wacana Paramarta: Jurnal Ilmu Hukum, 23(1), 80-92. https://doi.org/10.32816/paramarta.v23i1.566
  27. Tamba, T., & Mukharom. (2023). Efektivitas peran mediator dalam penyelesaian sengketa non litigasi dalam bidang bisnis maupun hukum. Jurnal Ilmiah Mahasiswa Perbankan Syariah (JIMPA), 3(2), 445-460. https://doi.org/10.36908/jimpa.v3i2.247
  28. Taufiqurrahman, F., Ibnususilo, E., & Melina, M. (2023). Pergesaran penegakan hukum yang positivistik menuju ke penegakan hukum yang progresif. Journal Equitable, 8(1), 159-183. https://doi.org/10.37859/jeq.v8i1.4450
  29. Utomo, A. P. (2023). Penerapan keadilan restoratif sebagai bentuk diskresi kepolisian terhadap tindak pidana penganiayaan di Polres Pasuruan. Sivis Pacem, 1(2), 131-162.
  30. Wulandari, S. (2022). Analisis kemudahan berbisnis dan tata kelola perusahaan yang baik di Indonesia dalam menciptakan daya saing global. JUDICIOUS, 3(1), 35-48. https://doi.org/10.37010/JDC.V3I1.698
  31. Yuhao, S., & Indiraharti, N. S. (2023). Tinjauan yuridis perjanjian pemborongan pekerjaan antara PT ABC dan PT XY. Tribuere, 1(2), 199-209. https://doi.org/10.25105/tribuere.v1i2.20108.

Author Biographies

How to Cite

Anwar, M., Lilyana, B., & Zatika, D. A. (2025). The Probability of Implementing Restorative Justice in Business Dispute Resolution. Journal of Law and Economics, 4(1), 10-23. https://doi.org/10.56347/jle.v4i1.236

Article Details

  • Volume: 4
  • Issue: 1
  • Pages: 10-23
  • Published:
  • Section: Articles
  • Copyright: 2025
  • ISSN: 2963-7937

License

Articles in this journal are published under the Creative Commons Attribution Licence (CC-BY 4.0). This means that users may share and adapt the articles published on this website in a reasonable manner, but they must give appropriate credit to the creator and indicate the changes they have made. Users must not apply additional restrictions, but must publish the work under the same license (CC-BY 4.0).

Similar Articles

Similar Articles

Discover other articles with topics similar to what you're currently reading. Find more references and expand your knowledge base.

Related Articles You May Be Interested In

More Similar Articles

The Doctrine of Unlawful Acts in E-Commerce Consumer...

Serlita Ruben Pendang

Vol. 4 No. 2 (2025): NOVEMBER
The Validity of Purchasing Land Underhand in Land Sale...

Waluyo Slamet Pradoto, FX. Hastowo Broto Laksito

Vol. 3 No. 2 (2024): NOVEMBER 2024
Analysis of Child Custody Following Divorce Caused by...

Brian Antonio, Sri Pramudya Wardhani

Vol. 4 No. 2 (2025): NOVEMBER
Pengaruh Nilai-Nilai Etika Terhadap Pencapaian Kinerja...

Damanhuri, T. Lembong Misbah, Syarifuddin Hasyim, Wolly Mistiar

Vol. 3 No. 2 (2024): NOVEMBER 2024
Most read articles by the same author(s)

Related Articles