Problems and Resolutions of Traditional Land Disputes in the Minangkabau Region
Abstract
The Indonesian Constitution recognizes indigenous legal communities as part of the wealth of the Unitary State of the Republic of Indonesia whose existence and rights are guaranteed. One such group is the Minangkabau community, which is often involved in customary land ownership disputes. Internal and external conflicts in society. Many things cause these conflicts: non-transparent deliberation processes, lack of openness in the termination of customary land, inadequate compensation, and lack of guarantees from private companies. This study uses a descriptive empirical legal approach with primary data sourced from the field. Disputes are resolved through customary procedures, which usually involve the implementation of customary systems, deliberation, consensus through negotiation or mediation between local customs and companies (or representing companies) → Formulation of customary land disputes. Then the decision is formalized by registering the agreement with a notary or court so that it can be [legally] enforced. However, dispute resolution can be facilitated by a third party, for example, the territorial government approach that provides support in negotiations or finding agreements
Article Discovery & Scholarly Lookup
DOIAuthor Biographies
Faculty of Law, Universitas Slamet Riyadi, Surakarta City, Central Java Province, Indonesia
Faculty of Law, Universitas Slamet Riyadi, Surakarta City, Central Java Province, Indonesia
Faculty of Law, Universitas Slamet Riyadi, Surakarta City, Central Java Province, Indonesia
How to Cite
License & Copyright
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
This is an open-access journal. All articles are distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (CC BY 4.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International (CC BY 4.0)Under this license, you are free to:
- Share: copy, distribute, and transmit the work in any medium or format.
- Adapt: remix, transform, and build upon the work for any purpose, even commercially.
You must give appropriate credit, provide a link to the license, and indicate if changes were made. You may do so in any reasonable manner, but not in any way that suggests the licensor endorses you or your use.
Copyright and Retention Copyright & Retention Authors retain copyright without restrictions and grant this journal the right of first publication under an open-access model. The journal retains non-exclusive publishing rights for archiving, indexing, and scholarly dissemination.References
Total: 15 References- Azami, T. (2022). Dinamika perkembangan dan tantangan implementasi hukum adat di Indonesia. QISTIE, 15(1), 42–55.
- Dewanto, B. A., Hutomo, P., & Widyanti, A. N. (2024). Kepastian hukum akta perdamaian dalam penyelesaian sengketa tumpang tindih hak ulayat dengan tanah sertifikat. SENTRI: Jurnal Riset Ilmiah, 3(5), 2361–2371.
- Djulaeka, S. H., & Devi Rahayu, S. H. (2020). Buku ajar: Metode penelitian hukum. Scopindo Media Pustaka.
- Elkas, W. D., Pujiwati, Y., & Nugroho, B. D. (2023). Program pendaftaran tanah sistematis lengkap (PTSL) untuk memberikan kepastian hukum pada masyarakat adat Minangkabau. ACTA DIURNAL Jurnal Ilmu Hukum Kenotariatan, 7(1), 1–14.
- Fartini, A. (2018). Hukum dan fungsi negara menurut Undang-Undang Dasar Negara Republik Indonesia Tahun 1945. Al Ahkam, 14(1), 1–19.
Similar Articles
Explore related articles published in this journal.