The Probability of Implementing Restorative Justice in Business Dispute Resolution
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.56347/jle.v4i1.236Keywords:
Restorative Justice, Business Disputes, Dispute ResolutionAbstract
The research analyzes the urgency and success probability of restorative justice implementation in business dispute resolution. The study employs normative legal research methodology through statutory and conceptual approaches. Legal material collection utilizes literature studies by identifying, gathering, and inventorying relevant primary and secondary legal sources. The analysis results demonstrate that restorative justice application becomes essential in business dispute resolution as it provides efficient, economical solutions while preserving business relationships. The mechanism serves as a strategic alternative to rigid and costly litigation, strengthening legal certainty and business climate competitiveness in Indonesia. The success rate of restorative justice in business dispute resolution shows promising potential when supported by parties' willingness, competent facilitators, and clear regulatory frameworks.
References
Ady Thea, D. A. (2022, September 27). Berharap konsep keadilan restoratif diadopsi dalam penyelesaian sengketa bisnis. Hukumonline.
Al Mandari, M. W. N., Thalib, H., & Salle. (2024). Penerapan restorative justice terhadap tindak pidana ujaran kebencian melalui media elektronik. Journal of Lex Philosophy (JLP), 5(2), 1153-1168.
Ambarwati, A., Setyaningrum, R. P., & Rezeki, F. (2024). The effect of burnout and employee engagement on turnover intention with work-life balance as a mediating variable in millennial employees of PT. ABC and PT. XYZ in Bekasi Regency. Indonesian Interdisciplinary Journal of Sharia Economics (IIJSE), 7(2), 4073-4090. https://doi.org/10.31538/iijse.v7i2.5165
Anwar, M. A. (2020). Kebijakan hukum pidana dalam penanggulangan destructive fishing pada rezim pembangunan berkelanjutan. Jurnal Hukum Samudra Keadilan. https://doi.org/10.33059/jhsk.v15i2.2182
Anwar, M., & Wijaya, M. R. (2020). Fungsionalisasi dan implikasi asas kepentingan terbaik bagi anak yang berkonflik dengan hukum: Studi putusan Pengadilan Tinggi Tanjung Karang. Undang: Jurnal Hukum. https://doi.org/10.22437/ujh.2.2.265-292
Anwar, M., Lilyana, B., & Zatika, D. A. (2024). Sosialisasi perlindungan hukum bagi guru dalam menjalankan tugasnya di Kota Bandar Lampung. AJAD: Jurnal Pengabdian Kepada Masyarakat, 4(3), 708-715. https://doi.org/10.59431/ajad.v4i3.414
Australian Law Reform Commission. (1999). Review of the federal civil justice system (ALRC Report 89).
Dinata, S. (2025). Reconstruction of foreign investment dispute settlement in Indonesia. Yustisia Tirtayasa: Jurnal Tugas Akhir, 5(1), 28-47. https://dx.doi.org/10.51825/yta.v5i1.30617
Gijoh, L. G. G. (2021). Implementasi hukum dalam kontrak bisnis internasional. Lex Et Societatis, 9(1), 111-119. https://doi.org/10.35796/les.v9i1.32142
Hardiyono, Pongky, P., Purwanti, S., Rusba, K., Siboro, I., & Putri, H. E. (2023). Inspeksi storage tank di PT. ABC pada proyek PT. XYZ menggunakan metode risk based inspection. Media Bina Ilmiah, 17(9), 2311-2318. https://doi.org/10.33578/mbi.v17i9.376
Harefa, B. (2018). Mediasi penal sebagai bentuk diversi dalam penyelesaian perkara pidana anak berbasis keadilan restoratif. Jurnal Komunikasi Hukum (JKH), 4(1), 18-26. https://doi.org/10.23887/jkh.v4i1.13657
Kristanto, A. (2022). Kajian Peraturan Jaksa Agung Nomor 15 Tahun 2020 tentang penghentian penuntutan berdasarkan keadilan restoratif. Lex Renaissance, 7(1), 180-193. https://doi.org/10.20885/JLR.vol7.iss1.art14
Kristiani, E., & Vic S., B. J. (2025). Urgensi penegasan kewenangan pengadilan hubungan industrial dalam penyelesaian perselisihan hubungan industrial. Jurnal Retentum, 7(1), 370-385. http://dx.doi.org/10.46930/retentum.v7i1.5379
Latimer, J., Dowden, C., & Muise, D. (2005). The effectiveness of restorative justice practices: A meta-analysis. Department of Justice Canada.
Mahendra, I. G. N. K. J. S. (2025). Peran bhabinkamtibmas dalam penanganan kasus tindak pidana ringan berdasarkan restorative justice di Polsek Kuta Utara. Jurnal Yusthima, 5(1), 451-364. https://doi.org/10.36733/yusthima.v5i1.11488
Ndruru, D. (2024). Perspektif hukum pidana terhadap tindak pidana penipuan oleh oknum TNI berdasarkan keadilan restoratif. Law, Development and Justice Review, 7(2), 158-174. https://doi.org/10.14710/ldjr.7.2024.158-174
Nugroho, A. P. (2023). Restorative justice: Terwujudnya asas keadilan dan asas kepastian hukum pada instansi kepolisian. Recidive: Jurnal Hukum Pidana dan Penanggulangan Kejahatan, 12(2), 152-271. https://doi.org/10.20961/recidive.v12i2.71620
Nursando, R., & Syahputra, D. R. (2024). Pendekatan hukum progresif dalam reformulasi pembayaran uang pengganti pada kasus tindak pidana korupsi. Ius Commercii (Jurnal Hukum Dan Bisnis), 1(1), 1-9.
Prastiti, H. S. (2022). Membedah parameter berusaha dalam upaya meningkatkan kemudahan berinvestasi di Indonesia (Studi komparasi Indonesia dan Vietnam). Dharmasisya Jurnal Program Magister Hukum FHUI, 2(1), 439-456.
Prayuti, Y., Lany, A., Takaryanto, D., Hamdan, A. R., Ciptawan, B., & Nugroho, E. A. (2024). Efektivitas mediasi dan arbitrase dalam penyelesaian sengketa konsumen kesehatan. Syntax Idea, 6(3), 1533-1544. https://doi.org/10.46799/syntax-idea.v6i3.3165.
Rosidi, A., Zainuddin, M., & Arifiana, I. (2024). Metode dalam penelitian hukum normatif dan sosiologis (field research). Journal Law and Government, 2(1), 46-58. https://doi.org/10.31764/jlag.v2i1.21606
Simandjuntak, R., & Singkay, R. (2024). Inovasi dalam penyelesaian sengketa: Pendekatan alternatif yang mengedepankan keadilan kolaboratif. Jurnal Social Science, 12(2), 187-196. https://doi.org/10.53682/jss.v12i2.10858
Singapore Mediation Centre. (2024, July 24). SMC's INTEGRAF scheme, featured on Business Times.
Sofyan, & Syatar, A. (2020). Restorative justice dalam upaya penyelesaian kejahatan hak asasi manusia perspektif hukum Islam. Shautuna: Jurnal Ilmiah Mahasiswa Perbandingan Mazhab, 1(1), 21-36. https://doi.org/10.24252/shautuna.v1i1.12422
Sulaiman, S., Harimurti, D. A., Pujiningsih, D., Handoyo, B. T., & Taufiq, M. (2025). Analisis yuridis terhadap penyelesaian sengketa perdata melalui mediasi di pengadilan. Jurnal Kolaboratif Sains, 8(2), 1152-1158. https://doi.org/10.56338/jks.v8i2.7087
Syaroni, I., & Widyaningrum, T. (2024). Peningkatan efektivitas penyelesaian sengketa administrasi negara melalui pendekatan alternatif. Wacana Paramarta: Jurnal Ilmu Hukum, 23(1), 80-92. https://doi.org/10.32816/paramarta.v23i1.566
Tamba, T., & Mukharom. (2023). Efektivitas peran mediator dalam penyelesaian sengketa non litigasi dalam bidang bisnis maupun hukum. Jurnal Ilmiah Mahasiswa Perbankan Syariah (JIMPA), 3(2), 445-460. https://doi.org/10.36908/jimpa.v3i2.247
Taufiqurrahman, F., Ibnususilo, E., & Melina, M. (2023). Pergesaran penegakan hukum yang positivistik menuju ke penegakan hukum yang progresif. Journal Equitable, 8(1), 159-183. https://doi.org/10.37859/jeq.v8i1.4450
Utomo, A. P. (2023). Penerapan keadilan restoratif sebagai bentuk diskresi kepolisian terhadap tindak pidana penganiayaan di Polres Pasuruan. Sivis Pacem, 1(2), 131-162.
Wulandari, S. (2022). Analisis kemudahan berbisnis dan tata kelola perusahaan yang baik di Indonesia dalam menciptakan daya saing global. JUDICIOUS, 3(1), 35-48. https://doi.org/10.37010/JDC.V3I1.698
Yuhao, S., & Indiraharti, N. S. (2023). Tinjauan yuridis perjanjian pemborongan pekerjaan antara PT ABC dan PT XY. Tribuere, 1(2), 199-209. https://doi.org/10.25105/tribuere.v1i2.20108.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Journal of Law and Economics
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
Articles in this journal are published under the Creative Commons Attribution Licence (CC-BY 4.0). This means that users may share and adapt the articles published on this website in a reasonable manner, but they must give appropriate credit to the creator and indicate the changes they have made. Users must not apply additional restrictions, but must publish the work under the same license (CC-BY 4.0).
