Last update: 27 October 2025
Number of documents: 40
Number of citations: 128
IF Google Scholar: 40/128 = 0.31
H-Index: 6, i10-Index: 4
URL Google Scholar: Click Here


This journal adheres to COPE's principles and ethical standards throughout its publication.

Ensuring integrity in research publication
Maintaining transparency in the review process
Upholding fairness in author and reviewer relationships
Preventing conflicts of interest
Protecting intellectual property rights
Ensuring confidentiality throughout the publication process
Authors have made a substantial contribution to the submitted work, including a substantial contribution to the conception and design, acquisition, analysis, and interpretation of data, drafting the article, or making essential revisions to it.
This journal usually only accepts manuscripts with up to six authors, unless a good reason is provided for adding more than six authors.
It is mandatory that all authors, throughout the article submission process and in their correspondence with the journal, utilize their academic email addresses.
All authors should be listed; non-author contributors may be acknowledged in the acknowledgement section of the PDF version of the article.
Our peer reviewers play a critical role in maintaining the quality and integrity of published research. We expect reviewers to adhere to the highest standards of professionalism and ethics.
Manuscript submissions undergo an initial assessment by the Editor-in-Chief (EiC) and a plagiarism check with iThenticate. The EiC will assign it to a responsible editor who handles the review process.
Peer reviewers are primarily published authors of this journal or other relevant experts who have benefited from the expertise of other authors before having their manuscripts reviewed.
This journal employs a double-anonymized peer review to ensure an impartial, fair, and non-biased review. Once a manuscript has been assigned to the reviewers, they have one week to accept or decline the review.
Our editors are responsible for overseeing the review process and making final decisions on manuscript acceptance. They are committed to maintaining the highest standards of editorial integrity.
The responsible section editor makes decisions based on topic suitability, technical accuracy, language quality, and ethical considerations.
Revisions are requested if the conditions for acceptance are partially fulfilled, but minor adjustments can remediate them. A manuscript is only accepted when all conditions are met.
The Editor-in-Chief (EiC) of the journal is the point of contact for ethical concerns, appeals, and complaints. The EiC is ultimately responsible for final decisions on an article's acceptance, rejection, correction, and retraction.
Last update: 27 October 2025
Number of documents: 40
Number of citations: 128
IF Google Scholar: 40/128 = 0.31
H-Index: 6, i10-Index: 4
URL Google Scholar: Click Here