Publication Ethics and Malpractice Statement

  • Home
  • Publication Ethics and Malpractice Statement
  • Home
  • Publication Ethics and Malpractice Statement
Publication Standards

Ethical Guidelines

This journal adheres to COPE's principles and ethical standards throughout its publication.

Ethical Guidelines

Our Commitment

Ensuring integrity in research publication

Maintaining transparency in the review process

Upholding fairness in author and reviewer relationships

Preventing conflicts of interest

Protecting intellectual property rights

Ensuring confidentiality throughout the publication process

Guidelines for Authors

Authors have made a substantial contribution to the submitted work, including a substantial contribution to the conception and design, acquisition, analysis, and interpretation of data, drafting the article, or making essential revisions to it.

Author Limits

This journal usually only accepts manuscripts with up to six authors, unless a good reason is provided for adding more than six authors.

Academic Email

It is mandatory that all authors, throughout the article submission process and in their correspondence with the journal, utilize their academic email addresses.

Author Listing

All authors should be listed; non-author contributors may be acknowledged in the acknowledgement section of the PDF version of the article.

Guidelines for Reviewers

Our peer reviewers play a critical role in maintaining the quality and integrity of published research. We expect reviewers to adhere to the highest standards of professionalism and ethics.

Initial Assessment

Manuscript submissions undergo an initial assessment by the Editor-in-Chief (EiC) and a plagiarism check with iThenticate. The EiC will assign it to a responsible editor who handles the review process.

Reviewer Selection

Peer reviewers are primarily published authors of this journal or other relevant experts who have benefited from the expertise of other authors before having their manuscripts reviewed.

Double-Anonymized

This journal employs a double-anonymized peer review to ensure an impartial, fair, and non-biased review. Once a manuscript has been assigned to the reviewers, they have one week to accept or decline the review.

Guidelines for Editors

Our editors are responsible for overseeing the review process and making final decisions on manuscript acceptance. They are committed to maintaining the highest standards of editorial integrity.

Editorial Decisions

The responsible section editor makes decisions based on topic suitability, technical accuracy, language quality, and ethical considerations.

Revision Process

Revisions are requested if the conditions for acceptance are partially fulfilled, but minor adjustments can remediate them. A manuscript is only accepted when all conditions are met.

Ethical Concerns

The Editor-in-Chief (EiC) of the journal is the point of contact for ethical concerns, appeals, and complaints. The EiC is ultimately responsible for final decisions on an article's acceptance, rejection, correction, and retraction.